Sunday, February 16, 2014

EDLD 5366 Week 5 Reflection


I was very nervous at the beginning of this class because I am not very creative and I am easily frustrated with technology.  I felt these constraints would work against me and I would be terribly unsuccessful.  However, each week I learned a new skill or about a concept, including the C.R.A.P. model, personal branding, Bloom’s digital taxonomy, and animation, which made designing the group website and completing this class a little less stressful.  Using the basic design principals of C.R.A.P. was a great starting point because it provided a creative outline for me and helped me make improvements along the way.  I am already applying those principles when creating things for my school, such as flyers and posters.  I now have a better understanding of and relationship with technology and I am excited about using it to enhance and improve my instruction. 
            I was responsible for completing the Cyber Ethics page for the group’s website.  I started by researching copyright laws and Internet safety and found a wealth of resources for both parents and educators.  Once I decided on my resources, it was much easier to design my page using the C.R.A.P. model.  As I worked, I checked the progress of my fellow members and made adjustments to my page to make the entire website align with the principles of C.R.A.P.  My group members and I communicated mostly through email to decide who would complete each page and get feedback and advice from each other.  They were very honest, supportive, and helpful throughout the project and I was satisfied with the final product. However, I think it would have been much better if we had worked more collaboratively on the home page to get a central design and then worked on our individual pages. 
         Honestly, I was unsure how this class was going to prepare me to be an effective educational leader.  However, the weekly assignments, readings, and videos have given me many tools that will help me lead others.  I am more comfortable with technology and have already started using it more in my instruction.  I learned that trying new things and taking risks can help me grow and will encourage others to do the same.  I experienced how the success of a group project is directly related to how the group members collaborate and communicate with each other.  I have also experienced the power of reflection and how it can be beneficial to teachers and students.  “The most powerful learning often happens when students self-monitor, or reflect.” (Gerstein, 2011).  I agree with this statement and plan to share this with my teachers to get them motivated to use reflection more regularly.  These are important skills that most of my students (and sadly some teachers) do not practice enough but will need to be successful life-long learners.  My challenge will be to expose my teachers and students to more group projects and reflection situations so they can develop these skills.
            Every teacher on my campus has a website, but most teachers use them for communication with parents and not instructionally.  I think teachers are missing out on a simple way to increase student engagement and reflective practices by not using their websites with their students.  Barrett (2005) suggests many classroom uses of websites from assessment to reflection for students of all ages.  Teachers could also use the websites to differentiate instruction for all of the levels of learners in their classes.  Since technology is and will continue to be a huge part of our students’ lives, I feel that teachers need to start implementing at least a few of these ideas in their classrooms.


Barrett, H., (2005). The reflect initiative. Researching electronic portfolios and learning engagement, collaboration, through technology. Retrieved 02/16/2014, from http://electronicportfolios.org/reflect/whitepaper.pdf

Gerstein, J. (2011, August 16). Where is reflection in the learning process? Retrieved 02/16/ 2014, from User Generated Education: http://www.usergeneratededucation.wordpress.

Williams, R. (2008). The Non-Designer’s Design Book. (Overview PPT) Third edition.

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Ancient Manuscript Reflection

Alice's Adventure Under Ground 
Written and Illustrated by Lewis Carroll

I chose this piece of writing because I already know the story so I could focus on and apply the four principles of design we learned this week, contrast, repetition, alignment, and proximity, when analyzing this work.  I immediately noticed the simplicity of the design as a whole, which allowed the author to make subtle changes that made powerful statements.  Examples of contrast from the work include using color when a new chapter started, changing from script fonts for narration and dialog to block letters and using all capital letters when reading signs or labels, and changing the direction of the text to show emphasis in the story.  Examples of repetition from the work include the illustrations and colors used at the start of each chapter, the page numbers in the top, outside corners of each page, and the use of the same script font and size for narration or dialog throughout the book.  Examples of alignment I noticed are mostly related to the illustrations in the book.  No matter where the illustration falls on the page, the text aligned to it either above, underneath, or wrapped around.  There were a few pages where the illustrations and the text were turned sideways so the reader can focus on what the author is sharing.  Examples of proximity include the placement of illustrations near the writing they depicted.  Some were small, others took up the entire margins, and a few took an entire page.  I think the placement of the illustrations in the book was used to help the reader through this journey and understand its importance to the author.

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Action Research Update!!!


After meeting with the teachers and discussing my project, I was excited that they were all on board to improve science instruction for our students. They too feel that our students are not getting equitable science instruction and want to find ways to make it happen. We looked at the state TEKS, our current curriculum, current assessments, and assessment data as well as student IEPs, ESL modifications, GT extensions, and reading levels to identify strengths and weaknesses within our current instruction. I also surveyed 5th grade students to find out what they liked about their science classes and what we could add to make it better. I then met with my principal to discuss the suggestions of the teachers and students. We were able to purchase materials needed to supplement and enrich our instruction, including science books that are on a variety of reading levels to add to our literacy library, additional lab equipment for hands-on investigations, and a subscription to BrainPop.com. Over the summer, I read articles about how to improve science instruction through questioning; inquiry based teaching, and effective ways to build science vocabulary and shared the strategies with teachers during summer professional development. The teachers felt a bit overwhelmed, so we decided to first focus on the strategies to improve our inquiry based teaching techniques and then work on the other strategies. I met with my principal again to review the plan we developed over the summer and she us the green light. Since school started, we have been using the strategies in class and meeting weekly at planning to get feedback and make necessary adjustments. The teachers have done an amazing job and are excited to see how these changes are impacting their students. Going forward, I will survey the students again at the end of the 1st nine weeks, review assessment data thus far, and finalize my paper for submission.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Week 4 Reflection...


My principal and I meet briefly this week to review the comments and suggestions from my blog and make revisions to my plan. Last week we had decided to focus on one grade level and special education student only, but after reading my blog we decided it would be best to include ESL students and Gifted and Talented students in my research. My principal feels that by only focusing on 5th grade, we can provide instruction that will not only benefit our struggling students, but also provide extensions our Gifted students. The changes are indicated in RED. Next, we looked at different ways to survey students and teachers and decided to use an online survey. That way surveys can be completed and data compiled quickly. I will start working on the survey questions in the next few weeks. We also discussed the timeline for my project and she thinks the sooner I start, the better off I will be. She suggested making a list of literature about differentiated instruction and to go ahead and start reading. I will take this advice because time will fly by and I don’t want to get behind. She is very please with the rest of my plan and is excited to get it started.

Jessica Gerlich’s Action Plan
Goal: To ensure that 5th grade science instruction meets the educational needs of all students and their abilities.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
1. Meet with the science team and discuss concerns with the current science curriculum.

J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

5th grade Science Teachers

Special Education Teachers

Instructional Paraprofessionals
March 2013
April 2013
Science Curriculum

Benchmark Test Data

Student IEPs and ESL Modification Profiles and GT lists
Notes taken about areas of concerns.



2.Collect and analyze data to identify gaps in instruction using assessment data, classroom observations, teacher interviews and/or surveys, and student interviews and/or surveys.


J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

5th grade Science Teachers

Special Education Teachers

Instructional Paraprofessionals

Targeted students groups from grades 2-5


March 2013
May 2013
Science Curriculum

Assessment Data (district and state)

Mega Monitoring Software

Student IEPs and ESL Modification Profiles and GT lists

Teacher/Student Interview questions and/or Surveys about Science Instruction
Spreadsheets and notes that identify the concepts students are not mastering, classroom observation notes, and reflections from interviews and/or surveys.

3. Develop a deeper understanding of current research and methods of differentiating instruction to meet the needs of all students.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Special Education Teachers

Instructional Paraprofessionals

5th grade Science Teachers

March 2013
May 2014
Literature about differentiating instruction

Interviews with Special Education Teachers

Professional Development about Differentiated Instruction
Reflections and ideas from literature, answers from interviews, and professional development classes. Lead a book study about Differentiated Instruction.
4. Engage in self-reflection throughout the project using blogs and journals.
J. Gerlich
March 2013
May 2014
Google site and blog

Reflection Journal
Entries on Google blog and journal.
5. Meet with science team to incorporate strategies into lessons.
J. Gerlich

5th grade Science Teachers

Special Education Teachers
May 2013
May 2014
Science Curriculum Guides

Notes collected from research about differentiated instruction
Lessons with incorporated strategies.
6. Explore programmatic patterns in implemented strategies using assessment data, classroom observations, teacher interviews and/or surveys, and student interviews and/or surveys.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

5th grade Science Teachers

Special Education Teachers

Instructional Paraprofessionals

Targeted students groups from grades 2-5

September 2013
May 2014
Science Curriculum

Assessment Data (district and state)

Mega Monitoring Software

Student IEPs and ESL Modification Profiles and GT lists

Teacher/Student Interview questions and/or Surveys about Science Instruction
Lesson plans, spreadsheets and notes about assessment data, classroom observation notes, and reflections from interviews and/or surveys.

7. Determine direction by meeting weekly with science team to discuss lessons and student achievement.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Special Education Teachers

5th grade Science Teachers

September 2013
May 2014
Science Curriculum

Assessment Data (district and state)

Student IEPs and ESL Modification Profiles and GT lists
Lesson plans written in meetings.
8. Take action for school improvement by meeting with science team and site supervisor to discuss implemented strategies and student achievement.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Special Education Teachers

Instructional Paraprofessionals

5th grade Science Teachers
March 2014
May 2014
Science Curriculum

Assessment Data (district and state)

Student IEPs and ESL Modification Profiles and GT lists

Notes and reflections from meeting.
9. Sustain improvement by frequent evaluation of lesson plans, assessment data, classroom observations, and teacher/student interviews and/or surveys.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

5th grade Science Teachers

Special Education Teachers

Instructional Paraprofessionals

Targeted students groups from grades 2-5

Ongoing
Science Curriculum

Assessment Data (district and state)

Mega Monitoring Software

Student IEPs and ESL Modification Profiles and GT lists

Teacher/Student Interview questions and/or Surveys about Science Instruction
Lesson plans, spreadsheets and notes about assessment data, classroom observation notes, and reflections from interviews and/or surveys.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Action Research Draft!!!

Here goes nothing...I think this is right. I would like to say "Thank You" to everyone who has shared their work because I could not have completed this without you. Please read over my plan and let me know what you think...I have a few questions for you too :)
1. Should I include grades 2-5 or just focus on 4 and 5?
2. Should I include special education and ESL students or focus on one?

I look forward to getting your feedback for improving my plan...thank you again :)


Jessica Gerlich’s Action Plan
Goal: To ensure that science instruction meets the educational needs of all students and their abilities.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
1. Meet with the science team and discuss concerns with the current science curriculum.

J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Science Teachers grades 2-5

March 2013
April 2013
Science Curriculum Guides

Benchmark Test Data

Student IEPs

ESL Modification Profiles
Notes taken about areas of concerns.



2.Collect and analyze data to identify gaps in instruction using assessment data, classroom observations, teacher interviews and/or surveys, and student interviews and/or surveys.


J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Science Teachers grades 2-5

Targeted students groups from grades 2-5



March 2013
May 2013
Science Curriculum Guides

Assessment Data (district and state)

Mega Monitoring Software

Student IEPs

ESL Modification Profiles

Teacher/Student Interview questions and/or Surveys about Science Instruction
Spreadsheets and notes that identify the concepts students are not mastering, classroom observation notes, and reflections from interviews and/or surveys.

3. Develop a deeper understanding of current research and methods of differentiating instruction to meet the needs of all students.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

T. Blair

Science Teachers grades 2-5

March 2013
May 2014
Literature about differentiating instruction

Interviews with Special Education Teachers

Professional Development about Differentiated Instruction
Reflections and ideas from literature, answers from interviews, and professional development classes.
4. Engage in self-reflection throughout the project using blogs and journals.
J. Gerlich
March 2013
May 2014
Google site and blog

Reflection Journal
Entries on Google blog and journal.
5. Meet with science team to incorporate strategies into lessons.
J. Gerlich

Science Teachers grades 2-5
May 2013
May 2014
Science Curriculum Guides

Notes collected from research about differentiated instruction
Lessons with incorporated strategies.
6. Explore programmatic patterns in implemented strategies using assessment data, classroom observations, teacher interviews and/or surveys, and student interviews and/or surveys.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Science Teachers grades 2-5

Targeted students groups from grades 2-5

September 2013
May 2014
Science Curriculum Guides

Assessment Data (district and state)

Mega Monitoring Software

Student IEPs

ESL Modification Profiles

Teacher/Student Interview questions and/or Surveys about Science Instruction
Lesson plans, spreadsheets and notes about assessment data, classroom observation notes, and reflections from interviews and/or surveys.

7. Determine direction by meeting weekly with science team to discuss lessons and student achievement.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Science Teachers grades 2-5

September 2013
May 2014
Science Curriculum Guides

Assessment Data (district and state)

Student IEPs

ESL Modification Profiles
Lesson plans written in meetings.
8. Take action for school improvement by meeting with science team and site supervisor to discuss implemented strategies and student achievement.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Science Teachers grades 2-5

March 2014
May 2014
Science Curriculum Guides

Assessment Data (district and state)

Student IEPs

ESL Modification Profiles
Notes and reflections from meeting.
9. Sustain improvement by frequent evaluation of lesson plans, assessment data, classroom observations, and teacher/student interviews and/or surveys.
J. Gerlich

M. Merricks

Science Teachers grades 2-5

Targeted students groups from grades 2-5

Ongoing
Science Curriculum Guides

Assessment Data (district and state)

Mega Monitoring Software

Student IEPs

ESL Modification Profiles

Teacher/Student Interview questions and/or Surveys about Science Instruction
Lesson plans, spreadsheets and notes about assessment data, classroom observation notes, and reflections from interviews and/or surveys.